Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Joe Perches wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 20:03 +0200, Rene Herman wrote:
"git info --maintainer drivers/ide/ide-cd.c" or some such would say "Alan
Cox <alan@...>".
Perhaps maintainer(s), approver(s), listener(s)?
I think something like this should be a git-goal.
What do the git-wranglers think?
The thing is, if you have git, you can basically already do this.
Do a script like this:
#!/bin/sh
git log --since=6.months.ago -- "$@" |
grep -i '^ [-a-z]*by:.*@' |
sed -r "s/^.*by: \"?([^\"]+)\"?/\1/" |
sort | uniq -c |
sort -r -n | head
and it gives you a rather good picture of who is involved with a
particular subdirectory or file.
Like the script! Especially since it reveled --since=6.month.ago and
uniq to me.
Just wondering, why order them in the acked, signed and tested? Other
then removing those, the added 'sed' also fix the <name> vs
"<name>"-"problem". + adding '-i' to uniq should help the result too, right?
Now a simple "diffstat -p1 -l <patch> | xargs <preferred script-name>"
makes the day. Too bad, as Joe pointed out, it does not include relevant ML.
cheers
Richard Knutsson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
