Re: merge-recursive: do not rudely die on binary merge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/14/07, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker <c.shoemaker@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
> >> This changes merge-recursive to still warn but do the "binary"
> >> merge for such a path; leave the "our" version in the working
> >> tree, but still keep the path unmerged so that the user can sort
> >> it out.
> >
> > Very nice.
>
> Forgot to ask.  I did this because you had trouble on #git
> yesterday and then at around the same time today somebody else
> had the same issue.  Did this patch solve your problem?  I do
> not think this has big risk of regression, but if it does not
> help anything there is no reason to put it in 1.5.3, so I am
> asking for a success report.

I got bit by this one earlier, and the patch fixed it here.
-- 
Chris Larson - clarson at kergoth dot com
Dedicated Engineer - MontaVista - clarson at mvista dot com
Core Developer/Architect - TSLib, BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux