On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 11:40:09AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > A much *better* picture than some manually maintained thing, in fact, > because it tells you who really does the work, and which way patches go... > > (Maybe you want to add a > > grep -v '\(Linus Torvalds\)\|\(Andrew Morton\)' > > to avoid seeing the normal chain too much, but hey, we probably want to > know too. Anyway - the script can certainly be tweaked, the point is > really just that the git tree _already_ contains the relevant > information). FWIW, I suspect that we are looking at that from the wrong POV. If that's about "who ought to be Cc'd on the issues dealing with <list of pathnames>", why does it have to be tied to "who is maintainer for <pathname>"? I'm not suggesting something like fs.ext2@xxxxxxxxxx with something like majordomo allowing to add yourself to those, but something less extreme in that direction might be worth thinking about... Hell, even simple $ finger fs/minix/dir.c@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with majordomo-like interface for adding yourself to such lists might solve most of those problems... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
