On 08/14/2007 08:28 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 20:03 +0200, Rene Herman wrote:
"git info --maintainer drivers/ide/ide-cd.c" or some such would say "Alan
Cox <alan@...>".
Perhaps maintainer(s), approver(s), listener(s)?
I think something like this should be a git-goal.
What do the git-wranglers think?
I agree. If this thing has source management, let's use it.
Until a time in the future when a system like that exists,
I suggest keeping MAINTAINERS up-to-date with
F: pattern
It'll be useful as git-set-maintainer seeds at least.
Yes. Seeing as how it's already been useful in updating the information it
would be a shame to throw what you already did away. Don't underestimate how
fast git-wranglers can implement stuff if they agree though... :-)
sticking headers on every source file isn't nice anyway --
it's meta-information and the SCM can maintain it.
It's like looking at $CVS$ keywords. Unsightly.
Again agree.
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
