On 02.11.20 16:45, Pratyush Yadav wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > On 01/11/20 06:05PM, Stefan Haller wrote: >> This is to ensure that a rescan is only performed once, even if it is >> requested multiple times during one event. We don't need this yet, because >> we only ever call do_rescan once per event so far; this is going to change >> with the next commit, when we also call it from FocusIn. > > I don't understand what this is trying to achieve. The calls to > do_rescan below only happen when the user explicitly does something, > like stage/unstage selected lines. Why would that event coincide with > the FocusIn event? > > If you mean to account for a situation where the rescan for > "Apply/Reverse Line" is executed before the rescan from FocusIn > finishes, then in that case the procedure rescan already accounts for it > by checking $rescan_active and the index lock. I'm aware that the rescan runs asynchronously, but I wasn't worried about the case where it's triggered concurrently while another one is running already; I was worried about the case where a rescan (e.g. coming from "Apply/Reverse Line") was so fast that it was already finished by the time the FocusIn comes. But I guess I misunderstood Tk's threading model, and this can never happen. So it does indeed seem that the existing $rescan_active logic is enough to prevent unnecessary rescans; I'll drop this commit. > Have you noticed multiple rescans in parallel? If yes then we might want > to look at why the check is not working. > >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Haller <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> git-gui.sh | 21 +++++++++++++++++---- >> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/git-gui.sh b/git-gui.sh >> index 867b8ce..8864c14 100755 >> --- a/git-gui.sh >> +++ b/git-gui.sh >> @@ -2376,8 +2376,21 @@ proc do_quit {{rc {1}}} { >> destroy . >> } >> >> +# Not to be called directly; use schedule_rescan instead >> proc do_rescan {} { >> + global rescan_id >> + >> rescan ui_ready >> + unset rescan_id > > Not sure if you're aware of it already, but it is worth mentioning that > rescan is asynchronous. The procedure call will return before the rescan > in actually complete. See the `fileevent` calls in rescan and > rescan_stage2. > > So in this case, rescan_id will be unset before the rescan is actually > done. This can be the right or wrong thing depending on what you want to > accomplish, which I'm not clear on. > >> +} >> + >> +proc schedule_rescan {} { >> + global rescan_id >> + >> + if {[info exists rescan_id]} { >> + after cancel $rescan_id >> + } >> + set rescan_id [after idle do_rescan] >> } >> >> proc ui_do_rescan {} { >> @@ -3683,7 +3696,7 @@ set ui_diff_applyhunk [$ctxm index last] >> lappend diff_actions [list $ctxm entryconf $ui_diff_applyhunk -state] >> $ctxm add command \ >> -label [mc "Apply/Reverse Line"] \ >> - -command {apply_or_revert_range_or_line $cursorX $cursorY 0; do_rescan} >> + -command {apply_or_revert_range_or_line $cursorX $cursorY 0; schedule_rescan} >> set ui_diff_applyline [$ctxm index last] >> lappend diff_actions [list $ctxm entryconf $ui_diff_applyline -state] >> $ctxm add separator >> @@ -3694,12 +3707,12 @@ set ui_diff_reverthunk [$ctxm index last] >> lappend diff_actions [list $ctxm entryconf $ui_diff_reverthunk -state] >> $ctxm add command \ >> -label [mc "Revert Line"] \ >> - -command {apply_or_revert_range_or_line $cursorX $cursorY 1; do_rescan} >> + -command {apply_or_revert_range_or_line $cursorX $cursorY 1; schedule_rescan} >> set ui_diff_revertline [$ctxm index last] >> lappend diff_actions [list $ctxm entryconf $ui_diff_revertline -state] >> $ctxm add command \ >> -label [mc "Undo Last Revert"] \ >> - -command {undo_last_revert; do_rescan} >> + -command {undo_last_revert; schedule_rescan} >> set ui_diff_undorevert [$ctxm index last] >> lappend diff_actions [list $ctxm entryconf $ui_diff_undorevert -state] >> $ctxm add separator >> @@ -4171,7 +4184,7 @@ after 1 { >> if {[is_enabled initialamend]} { >> force_amend >> } else { >> - do_rescan >> + schedule_rescan >> } >> >> if {[is_enabled nocommitmsg]} { >> -- >> 2.29.2 >> >