Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > Do you mean that this patch, squashed into 1/4: > ... > would be much more understandable? Yes, that was what I meant. We could have a "test_skip='under construction'" without any PREPARE_FOR_MAIN_BRANCH in 1/4 and then replace that with the endgame state you already had in 4/4, alternatively, which might already be enough explanation for a short transition period that lasts just few patches ;-). > If so, I agree, and I will gladly send off the next iteration with that > change. > > If I misunderstood, can I please ask you to give it another try to explain > it to me? No, you understood what I meant perfectly. Thanks.
