Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Having said all that. >> >> Here is how I explained the topic in the "What's cooking" report. >> >> A commit and tag object may have CR at the end of each and >> every line (you can create such an object with hash-object or >> using --cleanup=verbatim to decline the default clean-up >> action), but it would make it impossible to have a blank line >> to separate the title from the body of the message. Be lenient >> and accept a line with lone CR on it as a blank line, too. > > Just for the sake of searchability, I think it would be good to have > CRLF spelled out in this topic description (since I gather this is what > ends up in the release notes). But I don't feel that strongly > about that. > >> Let's not call this change a "bug fix". The phrase you used in your >> title, "more gracefully", is a very good one. > > It was your suggestion ;) > >> In the meantime, I've squashed your "oops forgot ||return 1" change >> into [PATCH 2/2]. > > Thanks for squashing it in. Squashing in the "oops forgot || return 1" was the only thing I did. I did not rewrite (and will not do so myself) the proposed log message 1/2, which needs to happen before the topic can hit 'next'. Thanks.
