From: Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
This benchmark covers the git status time for a heavily
dirty directory - benchmarking fsmonitor's refresh
When running to compare our perl vs rs-git-fsmonitor - we see that
the perl script incurs significant overhead - further motivation
to provide a faster implementation within git.
7519.7: status (dirty) (fsmonitor=query-watchman) 10.05(7.78+1.56)
7519.20: status (dirty) (fsmonitor=rs-git-fsmonitor) 6.72(4.37+1.64)
7519.33: status (dirty) (fsmonitor=disabled) 5.62(4.24+2.03)
Signed-off-by: Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
t/perf/p7519-fsmonitor.sh | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/perf/p7519-fsmonitor.sh b/t/perf/p7519-fsmonitor.sh
index 577f79d455..163a13bea3 100755
--- a/t/perf/p7519-fsmonitor.sh
+++ b/t/perf/p7519-fsmonitor.sh
@@ -165,6 +165,11 @@ test_fsmonitor_suite() {
git status -uall
'
+ test_perf_w_drop_caches "status (dirty) ($DESC)" '
+ git ls-files | head -100000 | xargs -d "\n" touch -h &&
+ git status
+ '
+
test_perf_w_drop_caches "diff ($DESC)" '
git diff
'
--
gitgitgadget
