Re: [bug] Stashes lost after out-of-memory situation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 25.10.20 um 13:27 schrieb Thomas Braun:
> On 10/24/2020 7:06 PM, René Scharfe wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Looks like stash calls rev-parse to see if a
>> stash pop removed the last stash and in that case proceeds to delete the
>> stash ref and its reflog
>
> I was a bit suprised to learn that removing the last stash entry also
> removes it from the reflog.
>
> Wouldn't it be more convenient if it would be kept in the reflog even
> after popping?

The log of the stash ref is separate from the normal reflog.  Popping
a stash doesn't remove anything from the latter.

René





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux