Re: [Outreachy] [PATCH v2] diff: do not show submodule with untracked files as "-dirty"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey,

> Again, it's a judgment call whether to go with modern style or follow
> existing style of the file.
>
> Another option is to have a preparatory patch which first modernizes
> the script, and then your new tests would follow modern style. But,
> that may be outside of scope of your submission.
>
> To summarize: The only really actionable review comments are the minor
> style nits in the C code. The nits about style issues in the tests are
> judgement calls, and could be handled (by someone) at a later date.

Thanks for the feedback, Eric. I would add the style nits in the
upcoming patch.

For the style issues in the tests maybe what I can do is I can submit
another patch with this patch to modernize the test scripts of these
files? I am expecting some feedback from the community on how to
handle this.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux