Matheus Tavares Bernardino <matheus.bernardino@xxxxxx> writes: > Oh, I didn't know about the portability issue with \+. This is already > in `next`, but I guess it's worth sending a follow-up patch to fix it, > right? (I see we have a second \+ occurrence in t7508, which could be > changed in the same patch.) Note that soon, typically a week, after a release, the tip of the next branch is rewound and all the topics that did not graduate to master has a chance to get a clean start. This may be a good use case for that chance.
