Re: [PATCH] fast-import: fix over-allocation of marks storage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-10-15 at 18:58:53, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 11:35:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > I do not know if an issue-tracker would have helped, though.  The
> > issue was discovered and discussed there the day before:
> > 
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqimg5o5fq.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Doh, and I was so proud of myself for diagnosing and fixing it. ;)

Well, you did write a great commit message and patch with functional
tests.

> Looking over the thread, I don't see any problems pointed out (though
> as your diff below shows, the original patch missed the re-ordering
> required for the submodule mapping call).
> 
> So I'd prefer my patch because of that fix and because of the tests.

Yeah, I'm fine with taking your patch as well.  Thanks for the tests,
which I think help us avoid future regressions here.
-- 
brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them)
Houston, Texas, US

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux