Hi Junio, On Thu, 15 Oct 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > Hi Junio, > > > > On Tue, 13 Oct 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > >> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > >> > >> > Somewhat related: I was wondering whether it would make sense for git.git > >> > to rename `strbuf` to `git_buf`? Would that make it easier to exchange > >> > code between the two projects? Or would it just be unnecessary churn? > >> > >> To us, "git_buf" is just as descriptive as "buf" and does not say > >> anything about the nature of 'buf' (other than apparently it was > >> invented and widely used here). "git_strbuf" I can understand, but > >> why should we? > > > > If it makes code sharing between git.git and libgit2 easier, why shouldn't > > we ;-) > > I see no reasonably explanation why libgit2 is not the one who uses > "#define strbuf git_buf" to make "sharing easier", though. That's a fair point, thanks for bringing it up! Ciao, Dscho
