> > the use of `xcalloc()`, and now that I think further about it, an
> > `xmalloc()` should be plenty enough: `regcomp()` does not need that struct
> > to be initialized to all zero.
>
> Yup, I think it makes sense.
Sure thing, I will switch to xmalloc() in v3. xcalloc()'s semantics
("allocate one structure of this size") appealed to me, but there is
indeed no need to zero-initialize the allocated memory before passing it
to regcomp().
--
Best regards,
Michał Kępień
