Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sequencer: pass explicit --no-gpg-sign to merge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Samuel Čavoj <samuel@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The merge subcommand launched for merges with non-default strategy would
> use its own default behaviour to decide how to sign commits, regardless
> of what opts->gpg_sign was set to. For example the --no-gpg-sign flag
> given to rebase explicitly would get ignored, if commit.gpgsign was set
> to true.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Čavoj <samuel@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  sequencer.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index 88ccff4838..043d606829 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -3678,6 +3678,8 @@ static int do_merge(struct repository *r,
>  		strvec_push(&cmd.args, git_path_merge_msg(r));
>  		if (opts->gpg_sign)
>  			strvec_pushf(&cmd.args, "-S%s", opts->gpg_sign);
> +		else
> +			strvec_push(&cmd.args, "--no-gpg-sign");
>  
>  		/* Add the tips to be merged */
>  		for (j = to_merge; j; j = j->next)

A test that passes --no-gpg-sign from the command line (because
commit.gpgsign is set in the repository used in these tests) would
be a good thing to have, next to the test you added in [PATCH 1/2].
You'd want to make sure the command line overrides the configured
default by checking that the resulting history are not signed.

Thanks.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux