Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.29.0-rc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 12.10.20 um 18:33 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> If this "feature" were experimental and if the experiment turns out
> to be a failure, would we have a viable alternative definition?
>
> Perhaps "--add-file names an untracked file in the working tree and
> the single '--prefix' that is used for entries that come from the
> tree object is applied"?  Or perhaps remove --add-file entirely as a
> failed experiment?

Removing --add-file entirely is certainly possible, but it's used in the
Makefile now and I can't imagine what would make its disposal necessary.

Turning it into a standard OPT_STRING_LIST option for full untracked
paths and using the last --prefix value for all archive entries would be
a more straightforward UI and might be versatile enough.

René




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux