Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
> > 
> > What does "usable" mean? Is it still slow ("barely usable") or is it 
> > actually fast enough to be truly _nice_ to use?
> 
> Very nice to use considering my hardware is rather old. git status used
> to take >1m and it now takes ~3s and git commit takes ~7s while it used
> to take >1m too. So it makes things nice to use and I guess things are
> MUCH better on faster hardware.

Oh, ok. Having a 7s commit sounds fine - certainly not instantaneous, but 
it doesn't sound too painful. Certainly not compared to what people live 
with normally in some other environments, at least.

Thanks go to moe for just giving a trivial script to reproduce the 
performance anomaly. It wasn't that hard to fix once there was a trivial 
and unambiguous test case.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux