Re: [PATCH] help: do not expect built-in commands to be hardlinked

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> Now, what I would have expected you to say when you found the `uniq()`
> function is: Johannes, why don't you call `QSORT(); uniq()` after the call
> to `load_builtin_commands()`? After all, `exec_path` and `env_path` might
> both be `NULL`...

Nah, you are expecting too much out of me.  I didn't ask because I
knew we didn't need to, and I didn't particularly care if you lucked
out or if you had the same understanding as I had how you arrived at
the right solution ;-)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux