Re: [PATCH] Improve diff pattern for PHP files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please choose a commit summary line of the form "area: summary", for
example:

   userdiff: PHP: catch "abstract" and "final" functions

Am 06.10.20 um 12:37 schrieb Javier Spagnoletti via GitGitGadget:
> From: Javier Spagnoletti <phansys@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Improve the output diff readability for php files by taking into account some missing function modifiers.

"Improve" is a noise word and need not be mentioned; a non-improvement
would not be accepted. Also, wrap long lines to at most 72 characters.
Perhaps:

   PHP permits functions to be defined like

       public final function foo() { }
       protected abstract function bar() { }

   but our hunk header pattern does not recognize these decorations.
   Add "final" and "abstract" to the list of function modifiers.

I am not a PHP expert, so I cannot tell whether what I have written
above makes sense.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Javier Spagnoletti <phansys@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>     Improve diff pattern for PHP files
>     
>     Improve the output diff readability for php files by taking into account
>     some missing function modifiers.
> 
> Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-864%2Fphansys%2Fuserdiff_php-v1
> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-864/phansys/userdiff_php-v1
> Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/864
> 
>  userdiff.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/userdiff.c b/userdiff.c
> index 1df884ef0b..a99d84a7e3 100644
> --- a/userdiff.c
> +++ b/userdiff.c
> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ PATTERNS("perl",
>  	 "|=~|!~"
>  	 "|<<|<>|<=>|>>"),
>  PATTERNS("php",
> -	 "^[\t ]*(((public|protected|private|static)[\t ]+)*function.*)$\n"
> +	 "^[\t ]*(((public|protected|private|static|abstract|final)[\t ]+)*function.*)$\n"
>  	 "^[\t ]*((((final|abstract)[\t ]+)?class|interface|trait).*)$",
>  	 /* -- */
>  	 "[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*"

It would be great if you could add test cases to t/4018/ that
demonstrate how these new keywords are handled.

-- Hannes



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux