Hi, Emily Shaffer wrote: > In order to enable hooks to be run as an external process, by a > standalone Git command, or by tools which wrap Git, provide an external > means to run all configured hook commands for a given hook event. Exciting! I would even be tempted to put this earlier in the series: providing a "git hook run" command that only supports legacy hooks and then improving it from there to support config-based hooks. This ordering is also fine, though. [...] > --- > builtin/hook.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++ > hook.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > hook.h | 3 ++ > t/t1360-config-based-hooks.sh | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Needs docs. [...] > --- a/builtin/hook.c > +++ b/builtin/hook.c > @@ -5,9 +5,11 @@ [...] > +static int run(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > +{ > + struct strbuf hookname = STRBUF_INIT; > + struct strvec envs = STRVEC_INIT; > + struct strvec args = STRVEC_INIT; > + > + struct option run_options[] = { > + OPT_STRVEC('e', "env", &envs, N_("var"), > + N_("environment variables for hook to use")), > + OPT_STRVEC('a', "arg", &args, N_("args"), > + N_("argument to pass to hook")), > + OPT_END(), > + }; > + > + argc = parse_options(argc, argv, prefix, run_options, > + builtin_hook_usage, 0); > + > + if (argc < 1) > + usage_msg_opt(_("a hookname must be provided to operate on."), > + builtin_hook_usage, run_options); Error message nit: what does it mean to operate on a hookname? Perhaps this should allude to the usage string? usage_msg_opt(_("missing <hookname> parameter"), ...); Or to match the conversational approach of commands like "clone": usage_msg_opt(_("You must specify a hook to run."), ...); [...] > --- a/hook.c > +++ b/hook.c > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ > > #include "hook.h" > #include "config.h" > +#include "run-command.h" > > /* > * NEEDSWORK: a stateful hook_head means we can't run two hook events in the > @@ -21,13 +22,15 @@ void free_hook(struct hook *ptr) > } > } > > -static void emplace_hook(struct list_head *pos, const char *command) > +static void emplace_hook(struct list_head *pos, const char *command, int quoted) > { > struct hook *to_add = malloc(sizeof(struct hook)); > to_add->origin = current_config_scope(); > strbuf_init(&to_add->command, 0); > - /* even with use_shell, run_command() needs quotes */ > - strbuf_addf(&to_add->command, "'%s'", command); > + if (quoted) > + strbuf_addf(&to_add->command, "'%s'", command); > + else > + strbuf_addstr(&to_add->command, command); > > list_add_tail(&to_add->list, pos); > } This would need to use sq_quote_* to be safe, but we can do something simpler: if we accumulate parameters in an argv_array passed to run_command, then they will be safely passed to the shell without triggering expansion. Thanks, Jonathan