Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] commit-graph: return 64-bit generation number

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:48:05PM +0200, Jakub Narębski wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> 
> Both Taylor Blau and Junio C Hamano agree that it is better to store
> corrected commit date offsets and have overload handling to halve (to
> reduce by 50%) the size of the GDAT chunk.  I have not heard from
> Derrick Stolee.
> 
> It looks then that it is the way to go; as I said that you have
> convinced me that variant 'c' (EDGE-like) is the best solution for
> overflow handling.
> 

Great!

So I have implemented the variant 'c' and I am unsure whether my tests
are exhaustive enough. Can you preview the commit "commit-graph:
implement generation data chunk" [1] on the pull request?.

Apart from that, I am ready to publish the v4 to the mailing list.

[1]: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/676/commits/390973da1d744cbb8a08a3b99c991f6d04ae9baf

> Best,
> -- 
> Jakub Narębski



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux