Re: [PATCH v9 1/3] push: add reflog check for "--force-if-includes"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> I can verify that the multiple calls to `in_merge_bases_many()` lead to a
> problem ...

Is it because it forgets to clear the marks?  I do not think so.
Besides the sample history demonstrated by the failing test were so
small that it didn't need multiple calls, IIRC.  There was a trivial
bug in the function when commit-graph was enabled and there is no
reason to avoid calling the function multiple times, right?

I just wanted to make sure that a "in-merge-bases-many cannot be
called twice" myth does not get etched in the archive.

Thanks for solving the puzzle with Derrick, by the way.  Very much
appreciated.  I was wondering if my CC'ing commit-graph folks were
somehow not reaching the intended recipients.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux