Hi Jake,
On Fri, 25 Sep 2020, Jacob Keller wrote:
> diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
> index eafc14cbe759..26a127142344 100644
> --- a/remote.c
> +++ b/remote.c
> @@ -682,6 +682,91 @@ static int match_name_with_pattern(const char *key, const char *name,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int refspec_match(const struct refspec_item *refspec,
> + const char *name)
> +{
> + if (refspec->pattern)
> + return match_name_with_pattern(refspec->src, name, NULL, NULL);
> +
> + return !strcmp(refspec->src, name);
> +}
> +
> +static int omit_name_by_refspec(const char *name, struct refspec *rs)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < rs->nr; i++) {
> + if (rs->items[i].negative && refspec_match(&rs->items[i], name))
> + return 1;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +struct ref *apply_negative_refspecs(struct ref *ref_map, struct refspec *rs)
> +{
> + struct ref **tail;
> +
> + for (tail = &ref_map; *tail; ) {
> + struct ref *ref = *tail;
> +
> + if (omit_name_by_refspec(ref->name, rs)) {
> + *tail = ref->next;
> + free(ref->peer_ref);
> + free(ref);
> + } else
> + tail = &ref->next;
> + }
> +
> + return ref_map;
> +}
> +
> +static int query_matches_negative_refspec(struct refspec *rs, struct refspec_item *query)
> +{
> + int i, matched_negative = 0;
> + int find_src = !query->src;
> + struct string_list reversed = STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP;
> + const char *needle = find_src ? query->dst : query->src;
> +
> + /*
> + * Check whether the queried ref matches any negative refpsec. If so,
> + * then we should ultimately treat this as not matching the query at
> + * all.
> + *
> + * Note that negative refspecs always match the source, but the query
> + * item uses the destination. To handle this, we apply pattern
> + * refspecs in reverse to figure out if the query source matches any
> + * of the negative refspecs.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < rs->nr; i++) {
> + struct refspec_item *refspec = &rs->items[i];
> + char *expn_name;
> +
> + if (refspec->negative)
> + continue;
> +
> + /* Note the reversal of src and dst */
> + if (refspec->pattern) {
> + const char *key = refspec->dst ?: refspec->src;
Would you mind fixing this? This keeps getting reverted...
-- snipsnap --
>From 4aea2a58a9f6bb1cbbc7a03db63a1465f9a801da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 22:27:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fixup??? refspec: add support for negative refspecs
The `?:` operator is not supported e.g. by Visual C. Let's not use it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
---
remote.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
index f7d20c059b3e..1659535c1a8d 100644
--- a/remote.c
+++ b/remote.c
@@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ static int query_matches_negative_refspec(struct refspec *rs, struct refspec_ite
/* Note the reversal of src and dst */
if (refspec->pattern) {
- const char *key = refspec->dst ?: refspec->src;
+ const char *key = refspec->dst ? refspec->dst : refspec->src;
const char *value = refspec->src;
if (match_name_with_pattern(key, needle, value, &expn_name))
--
2.28.0.windows.1.52.gbcabfe850c5e
