Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] refspec: add support for negative refspecs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jake,

On Fri, 25 Sep 2020, Jacob Keller wrote:

> diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
> index eafc14cbe759..26a127142344 100644
> --- a/remote.c
> +++ b/remote.c
> @@ -682,6 +682,91 @@ static int match_name_with_pattern(const char *key, const char *name,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>
> +static int refspec_match(const struct refspec_item *refspec,
> +			 const char *name)
> +{
> +	if (refspec->pattern)
> +		return match_name_with_pattern(refspec->src, name, NULL, NULL);
> +
> +	return !strcmp(refspec->src, name);
> +}
> +
> +static int omit_name_by_refspec(const char *name, struct refspec *rs)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < rs->nr; i++) {
> +		if (rs->items[i].negative && refspec_match(&rs->items[i], name))
> +			return 1;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +struct ref *apply_negative_refspecs(struct ref *ref_map, struct refspec *rs)
> +{
> +	struct ref **tail;
> +
> +	for (tail = &ref_map; *tail; ) {
> +		struct ref *ref = *tail;
> +
> +		if (omit_name_by_refspec(ref->name, rs)) {
> +			*tail = ref->next;
> +			free(ref->peer_ref);
> +			free(ref);
> +		} else
> +			tail = &ref->next;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ref_map;
> +}
> +
> +static int query_matches_negative_refspec(struct refspec *rs, struct refspec_item *query)
> +{
> +	int i, matched_negative = 0;
> +	int find_src = !query->src;
> +	struct string_list reversed = STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP;
> +	const char *needle = find_src ? query->dst : query->src;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Check whether the queried ref matches any negative refpsec. If so,
> +	 * then we should ultimately treat this as not matching the query at
> +	 * all.
> +	 *
> +	 * Note that negative refspecs always match the source, but the query
> +	 * item uses the destination. To handle this, we apply pattern
> +	 * refspecs in reverse to figure out if the query source matches any
> +	 * of the negative refspecs.
> +	 */
> +	for (i = 0; i < rs->nr; i++) {
> +		struct refspec_item *refspec = &rs->items[i];
> +		char *expn_name;
> +
> +		if (refspec->negative)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/* Note the reversal of src and dst */
> +		if (refspec->pattern) {
> +			const char *key = refspec->dst ?: refspec->src;

Would you mind fixing this? This keeps getting reverted...

-- snipsnap --
>From 4aea2a58a9f6bb1cbbc7a03db63a1465f9a801da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 22:27:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fixup??? refspec: add support for negative refspecs

The `?:` operator is not supported e.g. by Visual C. Let's not use it.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
---
 remote.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
index f7d20c059b3e..1659535c1a8d 100644
--- a/remote.c
+++ b/remote.c
@@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ static int query_matches_negative_refspec(struct refspec *rs, struct refspec_ite

 		/* Note the reversal of src and dst */
 		if (refspec->pattern) {
-			const char *key = refspec->dst ?: refspec->src;
+			const char *key = refspec->dst ? refspec->dst : refspec->src;
 			const char *value = refspec->src;

 			if (match_name_with_pattern(key, needle, value, &expn_name))
--
2.28.0.windows.1.52.gbcabfe850c5e





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux