As the commit message of 04a3dfb8b5 ("worktree.c: check whether branch
is bisected in another worktree", 2016-04-22) indicates, the function
`is_worktree_being_bisected()` is based on the older function
`is_worktree_being_rebased()`. This heritage can also be seen in the
name of the variable where we store our return value: It was never
adapted while copy-editing and remains as `found_rebase`.
Rename the variable to make clear that we're looking for a bisect(ion),
nothing else.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@xxxxxxxxx>
---
worktree.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/worktree.c b/worktree.c
index 5c9ecec466..b5702aa4eb 100644
--- a/worktree.c
+++ b/worktree.c
@@ -377,15 +377,15 @@ int is_worktree_being_bisected(const struct worktree *wt,
const char *target)
{
struct wt_status_state state;
- int found_rebase;
+ int found_bisect;
memset(&state, 0, sizeof(state));
- found_rebase = wt_status_check_bisect(wt, &state) &&
- state.branch &&
- starts_with(target, "refs/heads/") &&
- !strcmp(state.branch, target + strlen("refs/heads/"));
+ found_bisect = wt_status_check_bisect(wt, &state) &&
+ state.branch &&
+ starts_with(target, "refs/heads/") &&
+ !strcmp(state.branch, target + strlen("refs/heads/"));
wt_status_state_free_buffers(&state);
- return found_rebase;
+ return found_bisect;
}
/*
--
2.28.0.277.g9b3c35fffd
