Relative alternates question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

Trying to solve a problem with object/info/alternates and http (a rather
problematic combination) I noticed the following code in sha1_file.c:336 in
function link_alt_odb_entries.
(current master -- v1.5.3-rc4-41-g7efeb8f):

                        if ((*last != '/') && depth) {
                                error("%s: ignoring relative alternate object store %s",
                                                relative_base, last);
                        } else {
                                link_alt_odb_entry(last, cp - last,
                                                relative_base, depth);
                        }

The last is (if I understood the code correctly) begining of line, cp is end
of that line and depth is depth of recursion in resolving the alternates. Now
unless I read the code completely wrong, it means, that when git reads
a repository, it resolves relative paths in it's objects/info/alternates, but
if that contains further alternates, it would ignore relative alternate paths
there -- and therefore not find objects needed from there.

And my question is, is there any good reason to reject relative paths in
alternates of an alternate? From what I see the recursive call to
link_alt_odb_entries (via link_alt_odb_entry and read_info_alternates) has
all the information it needs to resolve such paths.

Thanks,

Jan

-- 
						 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb@xxxxxx>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux