Hi, On Fri, 25 Sep 2020, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Thu, 24 Sep 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > > > >>> Hopefully the V2 I just sent will be better anyway. > > >> > > >> FWIW I was working off of Miriam's `git-bisect-work-part2-v8` branch at > > >> https://gitlab.com/mirucam/git.git. > > >> > > >> I'm happy with Christian's v2 (with or without the indentation fixes I > > >> suggested). > > > > > > Thanks, both of you. The updated one does look good. > > > > Oops, do you mean s/path restriction/pathspec/ fix? v2 looks OK nesting-wise > > and I think your indentex-fix suggestion was for the previous one. > > I was referring to the indentation of the -/+ lines in the commit message. > Your current `SQUASH???` does not include the line-shortening, but that's > okay. I slightly prefer the version where single conditional statements > lose the curly brackets, but that's just nit-picking. > > A slightly bigger question is whether `git_oid_committish()` would be okay > enough, or whether we do need `get_oidf(&oid, "%s^{commit}", arg)` (as > your `SQUASH???` does). > > I'm not quite sure: aren't those two calls idempotent, with the latter > going through some unnecessary string processing dances? Whoops. You explained that elsewhere in the thread. My bad. Ignore me. Ciao, Dscho
