Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> We may need to audit recent additions of get_oid_committish() calls
> in our codebase. I suspect there may be other instances of the same
> mistake.
>
> Other than that, the code structure does look more straight-forward
> compared to the previous round. A fix on this version would involve
> peeling what is in oid down to commit, and you need to handle errors
> during that process, so it may not stay pretty with a fix, though.
> I dunno.
I'll queue it with this band-aid on top for now.
Thanks.
builtin/bisect--helper.c | 7 ++++---
t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/bisect--helper.c b/builtin/bisect--helper.c
index a1f97e3f6c..2fcc023a3b 100644
--- a/builtin/bisect--helper.c
+++ b/builtin/bisect--helper.c
@@ -474,13 +474,14 @@ static int bisect_start(struct bisect_terms *terms, int no_checkout,
} else if (starts_with(arg, "--") &&
!one_of(arg, "--term-good", "--term-bad", NULL)) {
return error(_("unrecognized option: '%s'"), arg);
- } else if (!get_oid_committish(arg, &oid))
+ } else if (!get_oidf(&oid, "%s^{commit}", arg)) {
string_list_append(&revs, oid_to_hex(&oid));
- else if (has_double_dash)
+ } else if (has_double_dash) {
die(_("'%s' does not appear to be a valid "
"revision"), arg);
- else
+ } else {
break;
+ }
}
pathspec_pos = i;
diff --git a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
index 94179b6acf..4dbfa63ca1 100755
--- a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
+++ b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ test_expect_success 'bisect fails if given any junk instead of revs' '
git bisect bad $HASH4
'
-test_expect_success 'bisect start without -- uses unknown arg as path restriction' '
+test_expect_success 'bisect start without -- takes unknown arg as pathspec' '
git bisect reset &&
git bisect start foo bar &&
grep foo ".git/BISECT_NAMES" &&
