On 2020-09-19 at 09:12:53, ronnie sahlberg wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > Hi Emily > > Emily, you want to contribute to wireshark? That is awesome. I think I > speak for everyone to send a HUGE welcome > your way and hope your experience working on and with wireshark be excellent! I think there's been a misunderstanding. I think the proposal was to have Emily and Jonathan, who are both significant contributors to Git, doing the mentoring from the Git side, along with someone from the Wireshark side. I don't think we know yet if anyone will be interested in working on it, but it seems from the response to be a proposal that has interest in both projects. Feel free to correct me if I've misunderstood. > I think a git dissector would be really awesome. > We do have a packet-git.c already in wireshark, but looking at it it > is very barebones (understatement of the year:-) > but getting a real full blown git protocol implementation would be > totally awesome. I agree that a Git dissector would be an awesome addition to Wireshark, for all the reasons mentioned, and I do hope someone is able to pick it up. I'd personally find such a feature very useful, and I know some colleagues who probably would as well. -- brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
