On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 13:51, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Next time, please send each of such unrelated patches independently, > not as a two-patch series that gives a (false) impression that the > second one needs the first one to work correctly. Hi Junio, My apologies for not making it clear enough - the fix in the first patch is for an edgy case of git diff-range, but the same fix applies to the 2nd patch. Any diff --stat comparison of two pipes would return 0-line diffs although the files would be marked as changed. It was originally just one commit; I splitted it up when I realized a test was actually triggered by this fix (false negative without the fix, false positive with it) as it's still independent enough to be reviewed/merged alone. Regards, Thomas