Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > This message [1] includes a simple forward-fix for the > parsing logic. I mention a re-roll in my preface, but > I was talking about a potential re-roll of part-3 when > that gets more feedback. > > My hope was that the quick fix could be applied directly > on top of this branch and then cook in next as planned. > I'll accept a delay if you think that is merited, but "on > hold" just seems like you are waiting for something more > from me. I was expecting [1] to be corrected in the commit in the series before it hits 'next', not a "oops we screwed up earlier so here is a band-aid on top", which we must do after the topic is already in 'next' or 'master', and also hoping that it would happen quickly so that we can move it forward. Thanks. > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/0b35829f-a83b-a093-2dc5-0e7d3b42fd15@xxxxxxxxx/
