Add tests covering the behavior of passing multiple contains/no-contains filters to git branch, e.g.: $ git branch --contains feature_a --contains feature_b $ git branch --no-contains feature_a --no-contains feature_b When passed more than one contains (or no-contains) filter, the tips of the branches returned must be reachable from any of the contains commits and from none of the the no-contains commits. This logic is useful to describe prior to enabling multiple merged/no-merged filters, so that future tests will demonstrate consistent behavior between merged/no-merged and contains/no-contains filters. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lipman <alipman88@xxxxxxxxx> --- t/t3201-branch-contains.sh | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/t/t3201-branch-contains.sh b/t/t3201-branch-contains.sh index 40251c9f8f..3cb9dc6cca 100755 --- a/t/t3201-branch-contains.sh +++ b/t/t3201-branch-contains.sh @@ -171,6 +171,42 @@ test_expect_success 'Assert that --contains only works on commits, not trees & b test_must_fail git branch --no-contains $blob ' +test_expect_success 'multiple branch --contains' ' + git checkout -b side2 master && + >feature && + git add feature && + git commit -m "add feature" && + git checkout -b next master && + git merge side && + git branch --contains side --contains side2 >actual && + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + * next + side + side2 + EOF + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'multiple branch --no-contains' ' + git branch --no-contains side --no-contains side2 >actual && + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + master + EOF + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'branch --contains combined with --no-contains' ' + git checkout -b seen master && + git merge side && + git merge side2 && + git branch --contains side --no-contains side2 >actual && + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + next + side + EOF + test_cmp expect actual +' + # We want to set up a case where the walk for the tracking info # of one branch crosses the tip of another branch (and make sure # that the latter walk does not mess up our flag to see if it was @@ -200,15 +236,4 @@ test_expect_success 'branch --merged with --verbose' ' test_i18ncmp expect actual ' -test_expect_success 'branch --contains combined with --no-contains' ' - git branch --contains zzz --no-contains topic >actual && - cat >expect <<-\EOF && - master - side - zzz - EOF - test_cmp expect actual - -' - test_done -- 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128)
