Srinidhi Kaushik <shrinidhi.kaushik@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > The struct "ref" has three new bit-fields: > * if_includes: Set when we have to run the new check on the ref. > * is_tracking: Set when the remote ref was marked as "use_tracking" > or "use_tracking_for_rest" by compare-and-swap. ... meaning that --force-with-lease with an explicit "the tip must still be at this exact commit" won't use the extra check to loosen the condition? That sounds sensible. > * unreachable: Set if the ref is unreachable from any of the "reflog" > entries of its local counterpart. The same comment applies on "reflog of which branch should we check"; I suspect that checking HEAD and without checking merge base may prove to be a good way to go. > + */ > +void apply_push_force_if_includes(struct ref*, int); SP between ref and '*'?
