Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> We seem to spend a lot of our time in memcpy:
> 
> 	samples  %        image name               app name                 symbol name
> 	200527   25.4551  libc-2.6.so              libc-2.6.so              _wordcopy_bwd_aligned
> 	104505   13.2660  libc-2.6.so              libc-2.6.so              _wordcopy_fwd_aligned

Sorry, that was a bogus trace with some old stuff in it.

The real profile was this one.

	102343   73.1377  libc-2.6.so              libc-2.6.so              _wordcopy_bwd_aligned
	3573      2.5534  git                      git                      cache_name_compare
	2328      1.6637  git                      git                      index_name_pos
	...

which matches the rest of my emails.. (the "73%" is actually really 
supposed to be about 95%, but I had X running and doing stuff at the same 
time, so it was only 73% of all the other CPU activity that was going on 
over the time I profiled).

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux