Re: Proposal: server-advertised config options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> ...  We've seen security
> problems in the past with .gitmodules multiple times because it's
> server-sent config (in the repository).

Exactly.  For some reason some people still seem to think that it is
wasteful that we force users to approve/reject copying from .gitmodules
to .git/config and push to read and use settings directly from the
former---I think it is a huge mistake.

> As a result, I'm very much opposed to allowing any config options to be
> copied from the server.

+1.

> It's also the standard approach that every project uses already, and it
> has the benefit that the user can inspect it at their leisure before
> running it.

+100 ;-)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux