On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 1:56 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So, this is an alternative approach to tackle the same issue > <xmqq4ko8yxp9.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> tried to address. It > ended up to be more involved than I would have liked, but it was > primarily because it needed some function signature changes. Not that it necessarily means much, but I gave the whole series a quick eyeball scan and it looks good. I like the idea of using one consistent "quote the path" routine. Chris
