Damien Robert <damien.olivier.robert@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > So this patch does not solve: > - the memory leak mentioned by Jeff in https://public-inbox.org/git/20200328131553.GA643242@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > - the non correct result in a triangular workflow mentioned in > https://public-inbox.org/git/20200406175648.25737-1-damien.olivier.robert+git@xxxxxxxxx/ > (aka v6, with an incomplete fix) > - the code duplication between branch_get_push_remoteref and remote_get_1 > (see my answer to Jeff's code mentioned above as to why his approach > would give a micro regression). > > Luckily I have figured how to solve 2) and 3). Unfortunately I haven't have > time to work on this since two weeks, so I have just sent the original bug > fix first so at least this one gets fixed. > > This is exactly as v4, except I moved the tests around to make them easier > to grok. Anything new on this topic? No rush, but I'd hate to see a basically good topic to be left in the stalled state too long. Thanks.
