Re: [PATCH] send-email: do not prompt for In-Reply-To

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Drew DeVault <sir@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Most mailing lists prefer that new patchsets and their revisions are
>> placed into a new thread. Additionally, knowledge of what In-Reply-To
>> means and where to find the Message-Id to fill in are domain-specific
>> and confusing to new users. In the niche situations where this is called
>> for, the --in-reply-to flag is sufficient.
>>
>> A config option, sendemail.promptInReplyTo, has been added to re-enable
>> the old behavior.
>
> We do not break existing users' habits without a good reason, and a
> subjective "this is the way I prefer" is *not* a good reason.

Having said that (and I am not retracting anything I said in the
message I am responding to), I haven't seen this prompt triggering
for me when I use send-email, with or without --in-reply-to option
on the command line.

Admittedly I use a wrapper around "git send-email" to add minimum
set of command line options that are always used (they are --from,
--envelope-sender, and --smtp-server) but I do not think they have
effect on the use of in-reply-to prompt.  

What are we doing differently, I wonder?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux