Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Drew DeVault <sir@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Most mailing lists prefer that new patchsets and their revisions are >> placed into a new thread. Additionally, knowledge of what In-Reply-To >> means and where to find the Message-Id to fill in are domain-specific >> and confusing to new users. In the niche situations where this is called >> for, the --in-reply-to flag is sufficient. >> >> A config option, sendemail.promptInReplyTo, has been added to re-enable >> the old behavior. > > We do not break existing users' habits without a good reason, and a > subjective "this is the way I prefer" is *not* a good reason. Having said that (and I am not retracting anything I said in the message I am responding to), I haven't seen this prompt triggering for me when I use send-email, with or without --in-reply-to option on the command line. Admittedly I use a wrapper around "git send-email" to add minimum set of command line options that are always used (they are --from, --envelope-sender, and --smtp-server) but I do not think they have effect on the use of in-reply-to prompt. What are we doing differently, I wonder?