Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > I've actually considered dropping child_process.argv entirely. Having > two separate ways to do the same thing gives the potential for > confusion. But I never dug into whether any existing callers would be > made worse for it (I kind of doubt it, though; worst case they can use > strvec_pushv). There are still several left after this patch, it seems. > > Likewise for child_process.env_array. Yup, conversion similar to what I did in this patch may be too trivial for #microproject, but would nevertheless be a good #leftoverbits task. The removal of .argv/.env is not entirely trivial but a good candidate for #microproject. Thanks.
