Re: [PATCH v2 3/2] credential-cache: use child_process.args

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:13:28AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 02:37:39PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/builtin/credential-cache.c b/builtin/credential-cache.c
> > index d0fafdeb9e..195335a783 100644
> > --- a/builtin/credential-cache.c
> > +++ b/builtin/credential-cache.c
> > @@ -42,13 +42,13 @@ static int send_request(const char *socket, const struct strbuf *out)
> >  static void spawn_daemon(const char *socket)
> >  {
> >  	struct child_process daemon = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> > -	const char *argv[] = { NULL, NULL, NULL };
> >  	char buf[128];
> >  	int r;
> >  
> > -	argv[0] = "git-credential-cache--daemon";
> > -	argv[1] = socket;
> > -	daemon.argv = argv;
> > +	strvec_pushl(&daemon.args, 
> > +		     "credential-cache--daemon", socket,
> > +		     NULL);
> > +	daemon.git_cmd = 1;
> 
> Yep, this makes sense. I don't recall any reason to use the dashed form
> back then, but probably it was just that I knew it was a separate
> program. Doing it this way will mean an extra parent "git" process
> hanging around, but I don't think it's that big a deal. We never try to
> kill it by PID, etc (instead we connect to the socket and ask it to
> exit). And anyway, it is becoming a builtin in a parallel topic, so that
> extra process will go away. :)

...and if I had read the diff header more carefully, I'd see that you
did this on top of that topic. :)

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux