Sergey Organov <sorganov@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Keeping the original sentence structure, e.g. >> >> ... and those options which imply abbreviating commit object names >> such as ... >> >> would have been what I wrote, instead of "either explicit or implied >> by", though. > > Sorry, but it'd then read: > > This negates `--abbrev-commit` and those options which imply > abbreviating commit object names such as "--oneline". > > that again essentially reduces to: > > This negates "--oneline" "--oneline" means a lot more than "do not use full object name", and I think we are on the same page with our shared goal of not negating everything "--oneline" means. We just want to say the option negates only the "do not use full object name" aspect. "and the effect of abbreviating commit objects implied by other options, such as '--oneline'" may be a more verbose way to say the same thing, I would think, but that would be overkill. I would have expected that with common sense readers would think it would be crazy for --no-abbrev to override everything --oneline means, but if you found that the original risks such an interpretation, perhaps we would need to be more verbose and explicit. I dunno.
