>> The definitions of 'verify_submodule_committish()' and >> 'print_submodule_summary()' had wrong styling in terms of the asterisk >> placement. Amend them. > I pointed out only these two, but that does not necessarily mean > they are the only ones. Have you checked all the new code added by > the series? There is one more. It is not related to my patch series though. Here it is: ---- static char *compute_rev_name(const char *sub_path, const char* object_id) ---- Would you like me to correct this one too? >> Also, the warning printed in case of an unexpected file mode printed the >> mode in decimal. Print it in octal for enhanced readability. >I actually did check this side ;-) and am reasonably sure that there >aren't any other irrational choice of format specifiers. Sure! No worries!
