Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:35:24PM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
>
>> The only change compared to v1 is that I've addressed the unportable
>> `branch-{1..1000}` syntax in favor of `test_seq`. I had to setup refs as
>> part of the setup and change the ordering for "update-ref --stdin" from
>> create/update/delete to update/delete/create, but I don't think that's
>> too bad. At least timings didn't seem to really change because of that.
>
> Another option instead of changing the order in the other tests is to do
> another untimed setup step before the push test. I'm OK either way,
> though.
>
>> +test_perf "nonatomic push" '
>> + git push ./target-repo.git $(test_seq 1000) &&
>> + git push --delete ./target-repo.git $(test_seq 1000)
>> '
>
> This works as far as Git is concerned, but "seq 1000" output with NULs
> is 3893 bytes. I wonder if some platforms might run into command-line
> limits there.
That was my thought when I saw the above as well. In addition, I do
not think it is a good idea to encourage digit-only refnames.
