On 8/25/2020 10:41 AM, Taylor Blau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 09:14:19AM -0400, Derrick Stolee wrote:
>> The code in builtin/repack.c looks good for sure. I have a quick question
>> about this new test:
>>
>> +test_expect_success 'repack preserves multi-pack-index when deleting unknown packs' '
>> + git multi-pack-index write &&
>> + cp $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index.bak &&
>> + test_when_finished "rm -f $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index.bak" &&
>> +
>> + # Write a new pack that is unknown to the multi-pack-index.
>> + git hash-object -w </dev/null >blob &&
>> + git pack-objects $objdir/pack/pack <blob &&
>> +
>> + GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX=0 git -c core.multiPackIndex repack -d &&
>> + test_cmp_bin $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index \
>> + $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index.bak
>> +'
>> +
>>
>> You create an arbitrary blob, and then add it to a pack-file. Do we
>> know that 'git repack' is definitely creating a new pack-file that makes
>> our manually-created pack-file redundant?
>>
>> My suggestion is to have the test check itself:
>>
>> +test_expect_success 'repack preserves multi-pack-index when deleting unknown packs' '
>> + git multi-pack-index write &&
>> + cp $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index.bak &&
>> + test_when_finished "rm -f $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index.bak" &&
>> +
>> + # Write a new pack that is unknown to the multi-pack-index.
>> + git hash-object -w </dev/null >blob &&
>> + HASH=$(git pack-objects $objdir/pack/pack <blob) &&
>> +
>> + GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX=0 git -c core.multiPackIndex repack -d &&
>> + test_cmp_bin $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index \
>> + $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index.bak &&
>> + test_path_is_missing $objdir/pack/pack-$HASH.pack
>> +'
>> +
>>
>> This test fails for me, on the 'test_path_is_missing'. Likely, the
>> blob is seen as already in a pack-file so is just pruned by 'git repack'
>> instead. I thought that perhaps we need to add a new pack ourselves that
>> overrides the small pack. Here is my attempt:
>>
>> test_expect_success 'repack preserves multi-pack-index when deleting unknown packs' '
>> git multi-pack-index write &&
>> cp $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index.bak &&
>> test_when_finished "rm -f $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index.bak" &&
>>
>> # Write a new pack that is unknown to the multi-pack-index.
>> BLOB1=$(echo blob1 | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
>> BLOB2=$(echo blob2 | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
>> cat >blobs <<-EOF &&
>> $BLOB1
>> $BLOB2
>> EOF
>> HASH1=$(echo $BLOB1 | git pack-objects $objdir/pack/pack) &&
>> HASH2=$(git pack-objects $objdir/pack/pack <blobs) &&
>> GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX=0 git -c core.multiPackIndex repack -d &&
>> test_cmp_bin $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index \
>> $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index.bak &&
>> test_path_is_file $objdir/pack/pack-$HASH2.pack &&
>> test_path_is_missing $objdir/pack/pack-$HASH1.pack
>> '
>>
>> However, this _still_ fails on the "test_path_is_missing" line, so I'm not sure
>> how to make sure your logic is tested. I saw that 'git repack' was writing
>> "nothing new to pack" in the output, so I also tested adding a few commits and
>> trying to force it to repack reachable data, but I cannot seem to trigger it
>> to create a new pack that overrides only one pack that is not in the MIDX.
>>
>> Likely, I just don't know how 'git rebase' works well enough to trigger this
>> behavior. But the test as-is is not testing what you want it to test.
>
> I think this case might actually be impossible to tickle in a test. I
> thought that 'git repack -d' looked for existing packs whose objects are
> a subset of some new pack generated. But, it's much simpler than that:
> '-d' by itself just looks for packs that were already on disk with the
> same SHA-1 as a new pack, and it removes the old one.
If 'git repack' never calls remove_redundant_pack() unless we are doing
a "full repack", then we could simplify this logic:
static void remove_redundant_pack(const char *dir_name, const char *base_name)
{
struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
- strbuf_addf(&buf, "%s/%s.pack", dir_name, base_name);
+ struct multi_pack_index *m = get_multi_pack_index(the_repository);
+ strbuf_addf(&buf, "%s.pack", base_name);
+ if (m && midx_contains_pack(m, buf.buf))
+ clear_midx_file(the_repository);
+ strbuf_insertf(&buf, 0, "%s/", dir_name);
unlink_pack_path(buf.buf, 1);
strbuf_release(&buf);
}
to
static void remove_redundant_pack(const char *dir_name, const char *base_name)
{
struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
strbuf_addf(&buf, "%s/%s.pack", dir_name, base_name);
+ clear_midx_file(the_repository);
unlink_pack_path(buf.buf, 1);
strbuf_release(&buf);
}
and get the same results as we are showing in these tests. This does
move us incrementally to a better situation: don't delete the MIDX
if we aren't deleting pack files. But, I think we can get around it.
> Note that 'git repack' uses 'git pack-objects' internally to find
> objects and generate a packfile. When calling 'git pack-objects', 'git
> repack -d' passes '--all' and '--unpacked', which means that there is no
> way we'd generate a new pack with the same SHA-1 as an existing pack
> ordinarily.
>
> So, I think this case is impossible, or at least astronomically
> unlikely. What is more interesting (and untested) is that adding a _new_
> pack doesn't cause us to invalidate the MIDX. Here's a patch that does
> that:
>
> diff --git a/t/t5319-multi-pack-index.sh b/t/t5319-multi-pack-index.sh
> index 16a1ad040e..620f2058d6 100755
> --- a/t/t5319-multi-pack-index.sh
> +++ b/t/t5319-multi-pack-index.sh
> @@ -391,18 +391,27 @@ test_expect_success 'repack removes multi-pack-index when deleting packs' '
> test_path_is_missing $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index
> '
>
> -test_expect_success 'repack preserves multi-pack-index when deleting unknown packs' '
> - git multi-pack-index write &&
> - cp $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index.bak &&
> - test_when_finished "rm -f $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index.bak" &&
> -
> - # Write a new pack that is unknown to the multi-pack-index.
> - git hash-object -w </dev/null >blob &&
> - git pack-objects $objdir/pack/pack <blob &&
> -
> - GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX=0 git -c core.multiPackIndex repack -d &&
> - test_cmp_bin $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index \
> - $objdir/pack/multi-pack-index.bak
> +test_expect_success 'repack preserves multi-pack-index when creating packs' '
> + git init preserve &&
> + test_when_finished "rm -fr preserve" &&
> + (
> + cd preserve &&
> + midx=.git/objects/pack/multi-pack-index &&
> +
> + test_commit "initial" &&
> + git repack -ad &&
> + git multi-pack-index write &&
> + ls .git/objects/pack | grep "\.pack$" >before &&
> +
> + cp $midx $midx.bak &&
> +
> + test_commit "another" &&
> + GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX=0 git -c core.multiPackIndex repack -d &&
> + ls .git/objects/pack | grep "\.pack$" >after &&
> +
> + test_cmp_bin $midx.bak $midx &&
> + ! test_cmp before after
> + )
> '
After looking at the callers to remote_redundant_pack() I noticed that it is only
called after inspecting the "names" struct, which contains the names of the packs
to group into a new pack-file. We can use a .keep file to preserve the pack-file(s) in
the MIDX but also to ensure multiple pack-files outside of the MIDX are repacked and
deleted. While this is very unlikely in the wild, it is definitely possible.
test_expect_success 'repack preserves multi-pack-index when deleting unknown packs' '
git init preserve &&
test_when_finished "rm -fr preserve" &&
(
cd preserve &&
midx=.git/objects/pack/multi-pack-index &&
test_commit 1 &&
HASH1=$(git pack-objects --all .git/objects/pack/pack) &&
touch .git/objects/pack/pack-$HASH1.keep &&
cat >pack-input <<-\EOF &&
HEAD
^HEAD~1
EOF
test_commit 2 &&
HASH2=$(git pack-objects --revs .git/objects/pack/pack <pack-input) &&
touch .git/objects/pack/pack-$HASH2.keep &&
git multi-pack-index write &&
cp $midx $midx.bak &&
test_commit 3 &&
HASH3=$(git pack-objects --revs .git/objects/pack/pack <pack-input) &&
test_commit 4 &&
HASH4=$(git pack-objects --revs .git/objects/pack/pack <pack-input) &&
GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX=0 git -c core.multiPackIndex repack -ad &&
test_path_is_file .git/objects/pack/pack-$HASH1.pack &&
test_path_is_file .git/objects/pack/pack-$HASH2.pack &&
test_path_is_missing .git/objects/pack/pack-$HASH3.pack &&
test_path_is_missing .git/objects/pack/pack-$HASH4.pack
)
'
I believe this checks your condition properly enough.
Thanks,
-Stolee
