Re: [RFC v2 1/1] refspec: add support for negative refspecs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/1] refspec: add support for negative refspecs
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:55:05 -0700
Cc: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@xxxxxxxxx>, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>, Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2008221528170.56@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet> (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sat, 22 Aug 2020 15:29:49 +0200 (CEST)")
References: <20200821215247.758978-1-jacob.e.keller@intel.com> <20200821215247.758978-2-jacob.e.keller@intel.com> <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2008221528170.56@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> The `?:` operator is not supported e.g. by Visual C. Let's not use it.

Thanks.  IIRC that was GNU extension?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC v2 1/1] refspec: add support for negative refspecs
  - From: Jacob Keller

References:
- [RFC v2 0/1] implement support for negative refspecs
  - From: Jacob Keller
- [RFC v2 1/1] refspec: add support for negative refspecs
  - From: Jacob Keller
- Re: [RFC v2 1/1] refspec: add support for negative refspecs
  - From: Johannes Schindelin

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] submodule: port submodule subcommand 'summary' from shell to C
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/3] index-pack: adjust default threading cap
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC v2 1/1] refspec: add support for negative refspecs
Next by thread: Re: [RFC v2 1/1] refspec: add support for negative refspecs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux