Re: [PATCH] Issue #353: Skipping lazy prereq for skipped tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 20.08.20 um 18:01 schrieb Gopal Yadav:
>  Skipping lazy prereq for test cases that are skipped via
>  the --run option or via GIT_SKIP_TESTS. Issue 353:
>  https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/issues/353
>
> Signed-off-by: Gopal Yadav <gopunop@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  t/test-lib-functions.sh | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/test-lib-functions.sh b/t/test-lib-functions.sh
> index 6a8e194a99..bac86ffd9d 100644
> --- a/t/test-lib-functions.sh
> +++ b/t/test-lib-functions.sh
> @@ -578,10 +578,10 @@ test_expect_failure () {
>      test "$#" = 3 && { test_prereq=$1; shift; } || test_prereq=
>      test "$#" = 2 ||
>      BUG "not 2 or 3 parameters to test-expect-failure"
> -    test_verify_prereq
> -    export test_prereq
>      if ! test_skip "$@"
>      then
> +        test_verify_prereq
> +        export test_prereq

$test_prereq is used as a named parameter of the function test_skip,
which uses it to determine if a test needs to be skipped due to
missing prerequisites.  Checking and exporting its input parameter
only after it succeeded probably won't do any good.

Anyway, didn't e0316695ec3 (test-lib: don't check prereqs of test
cases that won't be run anyway, 2019-11-12) already solve the
issue?

René




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux