Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> These patches are based on jc/no-update-fetch-head, once again. > > FWIW, that topic no longer exists (it has been swallowed by > Derrick's maintenance topics). As that topic is not near 'next' > yet, we might want to kick the patch out of it into a separate > jc/no-update-fetch-head topic again, base this series and also > maintenance topics on top of it. So, I've recreated jc/no-update-fetch-head on top of 'master' and then rebased these patches on top (which required some adjustment due to argv-array -> strvec API rename). t5300 stops passing at "[6/7] promisor-remote: lazy-fetch", which I haven't looked into details, but the topic is queued near the tip of 'seen' for today's integration cycle. Thanks.
