Re: [PATCH 1/2] merge-recursive: sometimes, d/f conflict is not an issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 06:13:12PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> When a merge has a d/f conflict on a path which was not touched
> between the merge base(s) and the remote HEAD, and the index and
> HEAD contain the same version for that path (even if empty), it
> is not really a conflict.

Hi, this patch solves the reported problem fine, and it didn't break
anything for me yet.  Can this still be considered for 1.5.3?

Thanks, Gerrit.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux