Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > The main concern I saw here was "we are doing a lot of work that isn't > used if the user doesn't want to log traces" - should I approach a > reroll of this topic by trying to be smarter about whether to set > 'quiet' or 'print' or 'verbose' or whatever it is renamed to, based on > whether there is a trace destination? Then for systems which are logging > traces the extra work is worth it, but for everyone else it can function > as before. > > I don't love it from a design perspective - it feels a little like > progress module is looking a little too closely at trace module > internals. Isn't that primarily due to the decision to tie progress and trace too closely? If so, perhaps that needs to be revisited? I dunno.
