On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 07:51:17AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > The rest of the series looks like a good direction to me, but is outside > > the scope of my series. I'd be happy to pick this first patch up for a > > re-roll of mine (which would require tweaking the rest of the patches on > > top to stop removing things from the .pdb list). Or we could just leave > > this as a separate topic and deal with the merge conflict (which would > > obviously resolve in favor of yours). > > Please feel totally free to cherry-pick my 1/3 as your 1/5 (but please do > fix up the author email address, if you don't mind). > > I have no problem with my patch series depending on yours, to make merging > easier. It doesn't look like that series otherwise needs a re-roll, so if it's OK with you, let's just have yours come on top (or independent, as the conflict is pretty easy). -Peff
