Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > As evidenced by the leak fixes in the previous commit, the "const" in > git_config_get_string_const() clearly misleads people into thinking that > it does not allocate a copy of the string. We can fix this by renaming > it, but it's easier still to just drop it. This turns out to be a bit more painful than I imagined. Do we want to do the same with repo_config_get_string_const(), by the way? Which would open the wound even wider, but may be worth doing for consistency.
